Deep Mistrust in Washington; Iran’s Released Assets Under US and Qatari Oversight

As negotiations between the Islamic Republic and the United States have entered a sensitive phase, American officials are discussing a plan according to which, even if part of Iran’s frozen assets are released, the Tehran government will not have full authority to spend these resources. This approach demonstrates that concerns about the Islamic Republic’s use of financial resources to support proxy groups and regional activities remain one of the main obstacles to mutual trust between the two sides.
JD Vance, the US Vice President, announced at the conclusion of recent negotiations in Switzerland that one of the key topics of discussions was designing a mechanism to monitor how Iran’s released assets are spent. According to him, the goal is for these financial resources to be allocated to improving the economic situation of the Iranian people, rather than being used in destabilizing regional activities.
Based on published details, a plan prepared with Qatar’s participation and members of the American delegation provides the Islamic Republic with limited access to part of the frozen assets, but spending this money must take place within specific frameworks and under the oversight of the agreement parties. Media reports indicate that the first phase of this program could begin with six billion dollars of Iran’s blocked assets in Qatar.
Vance explained this plan by saying: “We want to make sure that this money is helping the Iranian people and is not being spent to support terrorist activities.” He also announced that part of these resources could be used to purchase agricultural products from the United States, including wheat, corn, and soybeans, to be directly placed at the disposal of the Iranian people.
The US Vice President’s remarks come at a time when Western governments have repeatedly accused the Islamic Republic over the past years of financing groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas, and other proxy forces in the region. This history has led Western countries to seek strict monitoring mechanisms even in cases of reduced sanctions or released financial resources.
In another section of the Switzerland negotiations, the issue of Lebanon and the Islamic Republic’s role in supporting Hezbollah was also raised. Vance emphasized that Tehran must exert greater control over Hezbollah’s activities and play a role in reducing regional tensions. He warned that the continued activities of armed groups supported by Iran could confront the negotiation process with serious challenges.
Although American officials have spoken of significant progress in the talks, the negotiation process is still described as fragile. Reports show that the Islamic Republic’s delegation threatened to withdraw from negotiations at certain points, and verbal tensions between the two sides continue. However, technical talks to reach a final agreement will continue in the coming days.
What emerges from the statements of American officials is that even in the event of reaching an agreement, Washington is not willing to place billions of dollars in frozen assets at the disposal of the Islamic Republic without oversight and specific guarantees. This issue itself is indicative of the depth of mistrust regarding how the Iranian government manages financial resources and its role in regional developments.




